Hyperlinks Unintuitive in Readme #2

Open
opened 2025-09-02 17:06:54 -07:00 by Zekkos · 0 comments

The sentance "Next we will implement the methods which in this case will be an interface" has hyperlinks on the words "methods" and "interface". The "methods" hyperlink links to a line in the code and the "interface" hyperlink links to an external website.

I feel like there should be some sort of indication what something will link to. A good example of this come from the next line "and finally we will implement the struct to hold the actual state of the device. (note there is some funkiness in c with implementing this since you will need forward decls)" where "struct to hold the actual state" is a hyperlink to code. It is directly referencing something in the code.

The difference between "methods" and "struct to hold the actual state" is one is referencing the concept the lines of code represent while the other is referencing the actual implementation of a concept.

This is probably something that should be held to consistently throughout the entire readme.
I would go as far to say also doing something for internal links to somewhere else in the read me, like when "inputs" is being referenced. Instead of hyprlinking the word "inputs" it might be worth hyprlinking a phrase like "the inputs we previously defined".

The sentance "Next we will implement the methods which in this case will be an interface" has hyperlinks on the words "methods" and "interface". The "methods" hyperlink links to a line in the code and the "interface" hyperlink links to an external website. I feel like there should be some sort of indication what something will link to. A good example of this come from the next line "and finally we will implement the struct to hold the actual state of the device. (note there is some funkiness in c with implementing this since you will need forward decls)" where "struct to hold the actual state" is a hyperlink to code. It is directly referencing something in the code. The difference between "methods" and "struct to hold the actual state" is one is referencing the concept the lines of code represent while the other is referencing the actual implementation of a concept. This is probably something that should be held to consistently throughout the entire readme. I would go as far to say also doing something for internal links to somewhere else in the read me, like when "inputs" is being referenced. Instead of hyprlinking the word "inputs" it might be worth hyprlinking a phrase like "the inputs we previously defined".
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: sirlilpanda/c_state_pattern#2
No description provided.